Mezhdunarodnoe pravo (dlya bakalavrov i spetsialistov). Uchebnik [Shumilov V.M.] on Amazon.com. *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Skip to main content. From The Community. Try Prime Books. Prikaz myu rf ot 03112005 g 204 dsp manual. Go Search EN Hello, Sign in Account & Lists Sign in Account & Lists. Your #1 online source of new genuine original OEM parts for - Suzuki KIZASHI A6B424 (U.S.A. Sales region,, 325108) at discounted prices from manufacturers' warehouses in Japan, USA, UAE. Detailed diagrams & catalogues. Fast worldwide shipping to your door. Easy to find parts & order online.

The 15th century gothic carving of the Sorrowful Virgin with her Son in her lap in Ceuta's Sanctuary And thus the revolution advances a step, primarily by changing the mentalities of Catholics who are trained to believe they can participate in prayers and ceremonies of other religions and accept their false gods into their churches. A recent example of this tactic employed to further progressivist aims took place in the magnificent Sanctuary of Our Lady of Africa in Ceuta, a Spanish city on the north coast of Africa. For the eighth year in a row, the Hindus of Ceuta ended their raucous 3-day street celebration of the pagan god Ganesh by carrying the statue from the Hindu temple to the Catholic Sanctuary dedicated to Sancta Maria of Africa, Patroness of the city.

They leave a floral offering on the altar as part of an inter-religious ceremony. This year this outrage was on the Internet, making the rest of the world familiar with the blasphemous action and causing backlash for the Diocese. Sad to say, up to now there had been no protests from the Bishop or the faithful of Ceuta, who have unabashedly welcomed this devil into their Sanctuary as part of Vatican II ecumenism. A photo history of the blasphemy The Hindus communities from the Spanish regions of Ceuta and Milila, which border Morocco, exited the temple with a bier bearing Ganesh on August 27, 2017.

It was the last day of the three day Ganesh Chaturthi festival that pays worship to that elephant-headed deity, one of the many gods in the Hindu pantheon. The Vicar General waiting near the altar as the statue enters; below, the pagan deity enters the Church to face the altar with the statue of Our Lady and Our Lord above it The indignity to the Virgin worsens. A small choir in the front, facing Ganesh, sings a popular Salve Maria hymn to the devil god as the congregation watches with approval. The choir appears oblivious to the presence of Our Lady above the altar, focusing their gaze instead on the devil Ganesh. It was a blatant desecration of the sanctuary and a strong blasphemy against Our Lady. A Hindu woman 'takes a blessing' from Christ to transmit to the demon Ganesh, and then sends 'a prayer blessing' from Ganesh to Christ A meek 'apology' from the Bishop As this year's blasphemous entrance of Ganesh into a Catholic Church became public criticism poured in from around the world.

Even though the same ceremony has been performed for eight years, Bishop Rafael Zornoza Boy decided this year to issue a meek apology to the Catholic faithful, calling the event 'regrettable' for possibly causing 'pain, confusion or scandal in the Christian community.' Mateo duly tendered his resignation as Vicar General; he apparently received no punishment for his actions except for an 'admonishment' for his 'mistake to allow the entrance of these images.' However, the Bishop went on to assure us, 'he didn’t intend, at any moment, to venerate anything outside of our only and true God, for his intention was only to welcome the sign of respect that the Hindu community wanted to offer towards the Christian community and the Patroness of Ceuta.' In the note issued of the Diocese, it was stated that there was never a plan for making a joint inter-religious event and the only planned action was to leave a floral offering outside the Church of Santa Maria. I am not sure what is more scandalous: this supposed surprise of the Bishop that the statue was 'spontaneously' invited to enter the Church - even though the same blasphemy has been openly perpetrated for years, or his added sincere apology to the Hindus that he meant no rebuke to their beliefs by his statement.

So then, what was the point of his statement? It was not really an apology, but an appeasement meant to placate everyone: the offended Catholics and the Hindu offenders. Certainly, there was no condemnation of paganism, no sorrow expressed for the profanation of the Church, no attempt to clarify Catholic teaching that there can be no mixing of Catholicism and paganism. And, I feel certain, even this meek apology would not have been made if the video had not raised the ire of those Catholics who still have a remnant of the sensus fidei. Reactions of the people We can see the 'two steps forward, one step back' tactic applied in this case. The scandalous and heretical ceremony takes place for eight years without any objection from Church officials (two steps forward). The Bishop is pressured by the people to react and issues a laconic apology (one step backward), accompanied by words of reassurance that the reprimand should not be interpreted as any remonstrance toward the Hindu people or their so-called 'religion.'